“The links we have found in worms suggest the same kind of interactions occur in mammals although human biology is certainly more complicated. We have much work to do to sort out these pathways, but that is our goal,” said Dr. Jeffrey Benovic Ph.D., professor and chair of the department the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at Thomas Jefferson University.
Researchers use the roundworm as a model because it offers a simple system to study the function of genes and proteins that are relevant to human biology. The worm, for example, has one arrestin gene, whereas humans have four. Worms only have 302 neurons compared to the 100 billion or so in the human brain. In addition, their short lifespan of two to three weeks allows for timely observation of effects on longevity.
The resaerchers studied signaling pathways activated by G protein-coupled receptors. These receptors bind to all kinds of hormones, sensory stimuli (such as light, odorants and tastants), neurotransmitters, etc., which then activate a cascade of signals inside the cell. They regulate many physiological processes and are the target for about half of the drugs currently on the market.
“When it comes to receptors, worms are actually more complex,” said Dr. Benovic. “Humans have about 800 different kinds of G protein-coupled receptors while the worm has about 1,800. It relies upon these receptors to respond to sensory stimuli as well as various neurotransmitters and hormones.”
Arrestins were initially found to turn off the activation of G protein-coupled receptors inside cells. “Their name comes from the fact that they arrest the activity of receptors, so the worm offers a good way to study how its single arrestin protein interacts with protein receptors,” says Dr. Benovic. Two of the four arrestins that humans have are devoted to regulating receptors that respond to visual stimuli while the other two regulate most other receptors.
In this study, author, Aimee Palmitessa, Ph.D., a postdoctoral research fellow, deleted the single arrestin gene in worms to see what would happen, and found, to her surprise, that these worms lived significantly longer. She also found that over-expressing arrestin in worms shortened their lifespan. “A little less arrestin is good – at least for worms,” Dr. Benovic reported.
This isn’t the first discovery made regarding longevity in worms. Researchers have already found that activity of the insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) receptor can influence longevity in worms – a finding that has also been replicated in fruit flies, mice, and humans. Like arrestin, a little less IGF-1 receptor activity is good, Dr. Benovic explained. Further research has shown that caloric restriction can also reduce IGF-1 receptor activation and, conversely, over-expression of the IGF-1 receptor is found in some human cancers.
The researchers dug a little deeper and found that in the worms, arrestin interacted with two other proteins that play a critical role in its ability to regulate longevity. One of those proteins is the tumor suppressor PTEN; mutations in PTEN are involved in a number of different cancers.
Dr. Benovic said the connection between human arrestin and PTEN is not clear. “We don’t know at this point if human arrestins regulate PTEN function or if anything happens to arrestin levels during the development of cancer,” he said. “Do increasing levels turn off more PTEN, thus promoting cancer, or do levels decrease and allow PTEN to be more active?
“If it turns out to be the first scenario – that increasing amounts of arrestin turn off the tumor suppressor activity of PTEN, then it may be possible to selectively inhibit that process,” he says. “We have some interesting work ahead.”
The study funded in part by the National Institutes of Health was chosen by the Journal of Biological Chemistry, as the “Paper of the Week” – considered in the top one percent of published articles.